Home Career | Newsletter | Publications | Complaint Registration Sitemap

  National Resources
About Us
Consumer Affairs
Consumer Alerts
Consumer Events
Consumer Guide
Current Affairs
Discussion Desk
File a Complaint
Legal Forum
Member Activies
News Desk
News Snippets
Standards
Sites of Interest
  Search your Rights
 
By Profession
By Public Utility
By Product
By Service

  List of Consumer Org.
  By City


By State

  List of Consumer Courts
  By District


By State

Home >> Core Services >> Gist of Judgement

Gist of Judgement
 

 

Court : DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Date of Judgment: 13/05/2005
Appeal No. A-563 of 2002
Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam Limited
vs.
Raj Dutta and Others

Brief Facts:-

The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, briefly stated, are that the respondents Shri Raj Dutta and five others had filed a joint complaint before the District Forum u/s. 17 of the Act, averring therein that acting upon the various advertisements and representations, made by the appellant, the respondents got booked six seats with the appellant after making a payment @ Rs. 3, 045/- per seat to the appellant for Delhi-Kedarnath-Badrinath tour which was to commence from Delhi from 30/5/1994. The tour for which the booking was done was to be organized by the appellant and the duration of the tour was for eight days. It was stated in the complaint filed by the respondents that in the advertisements and representations made by the appellant it was represented that the appellant would offer excellent facilities Accommodation was also assured in double bed rooms with running hot water. It was stated that at Kedarnath the accommodation provided to the complainants was In a private lodge with small rooms which were dark and dingy and that too without any electricity. At Rudraprayag respondents/ complainants were provided only six rooms for 19 persons which was hardly sufficient for 19 persons. On a plain reading of the contents of the above document it is apparent that there is an admission on the part of the appellant with regard to deficiency in service on the part of the appellant. In view of the position explained above the order being impugned in the present proceedings, which is a well reasoned, order, suffers from no infirmity so as to call for any interference by this Commission in exercise of its appellate powers The present appeal, filed by the appellant, was found by the court devoid of substance. And was Thus dismissed.



 


For Full Judgment

 

 

 

@ Core Centre | Disclaimer | Feedback |Contactus
Developed & Managed by Consumer Coordination Council(CCC)
This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer 5 at 800 x 600 resolution.